Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another conference for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  • The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.
  • Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  • The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.

Author Guidelines

Abstracts should be sent through the OJS system. Follow the next link for registration:

The Conference Style Template is available at the following link:


In due time the authors will be sent only one set of proofs; these should be corrected and returned within 30 days from the end of the Call for Papers.


1. Abstracts reception

Reception of the abstracts will be acknowledged by e-mail in the briefest period possible. In this phase a first editorial assessment will take place in which we shall evaluate: a) adequacy of the thematic content and interest of the paper in relation to the editorial criteria of the Conference, and b) fulfilment of the formal format requisites demanded by the publishing ruling. Reception of the abstract does not guarantee its acceptance. In this first stage and before entering a second phase (peer-reviewing), we will communicate to the author if the abstract has been accepted, rejected or need some corrections.

2. Peer review

Abstracts will be sent confidentially and anonymously to be analysed by two experts of the Scientific Committee. They will deliver a report concerning the convenience of the abstract's acceptance, which will be taken into consideration by them. Announcement of the acceptance of the abstract, or if not, revision recommendations will be communicated to the author through the virtual platform. If the evaluating experts disagree, the abstract shall be sent to a third evaluator. 

3. Acceptations and refusals

The decision of acceptance or refusal of the abstract on behalf of the Committee will consider at least two circumstances. Excluding criteria and favouring criteria.

Criteria excluding admission of papers include:

a. Not being included under the scientific topics cultivated by the Conference.

b. Not sending the abstract in the required format.

Criteria favouring admission and evaluated by reviewing experts include:

a. Abstracts must conform to the topic of the CFP the author/s select.

b. Papers must be original or at least offer a qualitative analysis proffering valuable information.

c. Novelty, freshness and advances in the themes due in this publication.

d. In all cases, coherence in the presentation and logic in the abstract submitted will be demanded.

e. A good formal presentation will be required, that is proficient writing and text organisation: logical coherence and presentation.


The Conference Style Template is available at the following link:

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this conference site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this conference and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.